Editorial Principles and Sourcing Policy

Why do we publish this content?

A person who receives a tracker alert first needs a safe, understandable next step — not a sales message. Our guides are prepared to help interpret a technical alert, carry out a physical search safely, avoid needlessly altering evidence, and learn the official application paths in Türkiye.

Product information is presented where it can strengthen the reader’s technical search, together with the device’s limits.

Our sourcing priority

For technical claims, we primarily use device manufacturers’ current support pages and operating-system documentation. For legal and public support information, we prioritize texts published by the GNAT (Turkish parliament), the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Family and Social Services, the KVKK (Turkish data protection authority), and other official institutions.

The core official sources used are listed at the end of every legal article. When a source is updated or application steps change, the article’s “Updated” date changes. We never move content dates forward just to look new.

Who prepares it?

Content is published under the AntiAirtag Editorial Team byline. The team draws on the technical product context of Özdemir Tech, which develops the product’s Bluetooth Low Energy scanning approach, antenna system, and app flow.

AI-assisted tools may be used for drafting, structuring, or language checks. That use does not produce expert opinion. Technical and legal claims are matched against the relevant primary sources; content is not presented as personal legal counsel.

Legal content standard

Legal articles never state that a specific person committed a crime, that a specific piece of evidence will produce a definitive result, or that a specific measure will certainly be granted. The distinction between “may come up”, “is assessed on the facts of the case”, and “the competent authority decides” is preserved.

In content with an urgent safety risk, 112, law enforcement, and official support channels are shown before any product promotion. Explanations about Law No. 6284, TCK Article 123/A, or personal data present a general framework; they are no substitute for a lawyer’s file review.

Technical content standard

It is stated clearly that BLE detectors can only see compatible devices that are broadcasting and in range. RSSI is explained as not exact distance or direction, and as affected by metal, walls, people, and electromagnetic noise.

No unverified range, definitive detection rate, or unmeasured superiority claim over rivals is published for AntiAirtag products. If test results are shared in the future, the method, environment, and limits will be explained together.

Corrections and feedback

If you notice an error in a technical step, legislation link, or product detail, you can write to [email protected]. Corrections are made visibly in the content, and the update date is refreshed for meaningful changes.

Commercial transparency

The AntiAirtag blog is published by the company that develops AntiAirtag products. Product links do not hide this commercial relationship. The technical limits of products recommended in the content, and whether they are on sale, are stated openly.